Antidilution Protection FAQs

"Dilution" is a very frequently heard word in startup circles. And I think most people have a pretty good general sense of what dilution is--it's when you have a piece of the pie and something happens which decreases your piece.

What I think is less understood, are (1) the implications of something happening which results in dilution to existing equity holders, and (2) the rights to protect against the resulting dilution (also known as "antidilution protection").

What Triggers a Dilutive Event.

So what has to happen to decrease your piece? Let's run through the simple algebraic analysis first. You (the founder or the investor) have x shares and the company has a total of y shares outstanding. So your piece is x/y. Then the company issues more shares so that it has y+n total shares outstanding, but you still have only x shares. x/y > x/(y+n), so you had a higher percentage of the company before the dilutive issuance.

But now let's see what's happening from a business perspective. Why is the company issuing more shares? Not every dilutive issuance is equal in its impact on the company. If the issuance serves to increase the value of the company, your smaller piece of the pie might in fact have a higher value than the bigger piece of the smaller pie that you had before.

Example: Suppose you are a 10% equity holder in a company valued at $5,000,000. The company subsequently raises another $5,000,000 at a $15,000,000 pre-money valuation--a dilutive event. Prior to the financing you have 10% of $5,000,000, which is $500,000, and post financing you have 7.5% of a $20,000,000 company, which is $1,500,000. Your stake decreased, and your percent ownership was diluted, but you are doing ok!

The example above demonstrates that what you should watch out for is not securities issuances which dilute your percentage interest, but securities issuances that decrease your total value. The latter are the instances where equity is being issued without a corresponding increase in the value of the company. Examples of those might be (a) warrants with a low exercise price that are issued as part of a loan transaction, (b) shares issued to investors at a discount or a price lower than the company's last valuation, or (c) shares issued to employees.

Protection Against Antidilution.

Now that we know how to distinguish between different kinds of dilution, how do we protect against the bad kind, the kind that dectracts from your value?

As disappointing as this may be for founders and other holders of common stock to hear, really the only equity holders who ever get antidilution protection are the investors (holders of preferred stock). I am sure there are exceptions to this rule, in the way that there are exceptions to every rule. But 99.99% of the time this holds true.

It may not seem fair to someone who has earned his sweat equity with... well, sweat and hard work. But investors are the ones that pay the full market price for their shares (usually 3x or more the price of Common Stock), and they are the ones who are more typically able to successfully negotiate some protection for themselves. Note, however, that even their protection does not lock their initially purchased percentage for perpetuity. Generally speaking, with each new sale of securities, their percentage, too, will be effected. However, they will get an adjustment (the conversion rate at which they Preferred Stock converts into Common Stock will increase, such that the same number of Preferred shares will be convertible into more shares of Common Stock) for issuances made at a price below their entry point, with certain exceptions. The list of exceptions to investors' antidilution protection is frequently the subject to heavy negotiation between company and investors' counsel.

Happy company making!

Inna

Inna Efimchik at White Summers Caffee & James LLP, specializes in assisting emerging technology companies in Silicon Valley and beyond, providing incorporation, financing, and licensing services as well as general corporate counseling.

LEGAL DISCLAIMER

Copyright Notice. The copyright for all original content in this post and any linked files is owned by Inna Efimchik. All rights are reserved.

No Attorney-Client Relationship. This post has been prepared by Inna Efimchik of White Summers for general informational purposes only. The information provided herein does not constitute advertising, a solicitation or legal advice. Neither the availability, transmission, receipt nor use of any information included herein is intended to create, or constitutes formation of, an attorney-client relationship or any other special relationship or privilege. You should not rely upon this post for any purpose without seeking legal advice from licensed attorneys in the relevant state(s).

Compliance with Laws. You agree to use the information provided herein in compliance with all applicable laws, including applicable securities laws, and you agree to indemnify and hold Inna Efimchik and White Summers Caffee & James LLP harmless from and against any and all claims, damages, losses or obligations arising from your failure to comply.

Disclaimer of Liability. ALL INFORMATION IS PROVIDED AS-IS WITH NO REPRESENTATIONS OR WARRANTIES, EITHER EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. YOU ASSUME COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY AND RISK FOR USE OF THE INFORMATION IN THIS POST.

Inna Efimchik expressly disclaims all liability, loss or risk incurred as a direct or indirect consequence of the use of any information provided herein. By using any information in this post, you waive any rights or claims you may have against Inna Efimchik and White Summers Caffee & James LLP in connection therewith.

Private Company Board of Directors FAQs

Inevitably, the best topics for my posts come from questions I get from my clients. Hot off the press, these questions (and answers) came up on a seed round financing that I am working on this week!

Who makes the final decision on the number of Board members?

In Delaware, a Company's bylaws will typically allow the Board of Directors to fix the total number of directors, provided that any decrease in the total authorized number of directors will not remove from office any incumbent director. The bylaws may also fix a specific number of directors or specify a range (e.g., like in California), such that changing the number of directors from such specific number or to a number outside the range will require amendment of the bylaws.

In financings, the total number of directors that constitute the entire board will be negotiated with the investors, who will often insist that the number of directors may not be changed without their consent. (For those who like the technical details, in equity financings you will usually find this in the protective provisions of the certificate of incorporation and in debt financings, in the negative covenants.)

What are the qualifications for Board membership?

There are no special requirements as to who can be a Board member, so long as it’s an individual (and not a corporation). A Board member may, but does not have to be, a stakeholder of the Company.

What percent ownership of the Company entitles a stakeholder to designate a Board member?

Unlike certain foreign jurisdictions, in the US, there is no statutory right based on (a minority) percent ownership to nominate a Board member. Practically speaking, a majority stockholder will, in the absence of a voting agreement, be able to put his own designees on the Board. In certain states, like California, cumulative voting applies to election and removal of directors.

Normally, whether an investor gets a Board seat is negotiated at the term sheet stage and subsequently built into the charter (certificate/articles of incorporation) and voting agreement. The right to nominate an investor will usually be conditional on such investor maintaining some number or percent of shares initially purchased by such investor.

How long is the term of a Board member?

Normally, directors are elected to the Board to serve until they resign or are replaced by another director. It is possible to elect directors for a set term, e.g., for 3 years, but that is not usually done in small privately-held companies.

What is the process for removing a Board member?

A board member who does not voluntarily resign may be removed by the stockholders who had the right to appoint such Board member in the first place. In the absence of special provisions, a majority of the outstanding shares will be able to remove a director. If special rights have been negotiated, such that the preferred stock holders designate a director, the vote of the preferred stock holders will be required to remove the director designated by them. In certain states, like California, cumulative voting applies to election and removal of directors.

How does the Board vote?

The Board can vote (1) at a meeting, or (2) by unanimous written consent. There are no special rules about which type of vote needs to be obtained for which type of action. This is at the discretion of the Company. But there are some differences in the mechanics:
• Meetings of the Board can be held by teleconference, so everyone does not have to be in the same room. At a meeting, assuming notice requirements have been met, a majority of directors will usually constitute quorum (which means that it’s enough to start the meeting and vote on matters before the Board), unless a higher threshold is set in the bylaws. A majority of the directors present at the meeting (in person or otherwise) is required to pass a resolution. So, technically, in a board of 5 members, if 3 members attend and only 2 vote on a particular matter, that will be sufficient, though less than the actual majority of the whole Board. Practically, however, Boards that are not dysfunctional try to vote on matters unanimously, and if 2 of 5 directors can’t make it, they will probably reschedule the meeting.

• Actions by written consent have to be signed by every director. When the Board is small--one or two co-founders--written consents are the typical way to approve matters, so that there is a written record of Board action.

Happy company making!

Inna

Inna Efimchik at White Summers Caffee & James LLP, specializes in assisting emerging technology companies in Silicon Valley and beyond, providing incorporation, financing, and licensing services as well as general corporate counseling.

LEGAL DISCLAIMER

Copyright Notice. The copyright for all original content in this post and any linked files is owned by Inna Efimchik. All rights are reserved.

No Attorney-Client Relationship. This post has been prepared by Inna Efimchik of White Summers for general informational purposes only. The information provided herein does not constitute advertising, a solicitation or legal advice. Neither the availability, transmission, receipt nor use of any information included herein is intended to create, or constitutes formation of, an attorney-client relationship or any other special relationship or privilege. You should not rely upon this post for any purpose without seeking legal advice from licensed attorneys in the relevant state(s).

Compliance with Laws. You agree to use the information provided herein in compliance with all applicable laws, including applicable securities laws, and you agree to indemnify and hold Inna Efimchik and White Summers Caffee & James LLP harmless from and against any and all claims, damages, losses or obligations arising from your failure to comply.

Disclaimer of Liability. ALL INFORMATION IS PROVIDED AS-IS WITH NO REPRESENTATIONS OR WARRANTIES, EITHER EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. YOU ASSUME COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY AND RISK FOR USE OF THE INFORMATION IN THIS POST.

Inna Efimchik expressly disclaims all liability, loss or risk incurred as a direct or indirect consequence of the use of any information provided herein. By using any information in this post, you waive any rights or claims you may have against Inna Efimchik and White Summers Caffee & James LLP in connection therewith.